AI Materials Case Study
AI
Materials
8 employees, based in Sheffield
Mark Burton,
Managing Director
“An MD of a small business can often feel that he has
nowhere to turn for really reliable help and advice with problems
that he just does not have the time to sort out himself.
MAS provides people with the skills and experience to step
in at a practical level and make a difference straight away.”
“Working with Mike Andrews and the team at MAS has been
a real boost to our Company. “ Company Profile
Founded in 1993, AI Materials supplies titanium, nickel alloy
and stainless bar,
sheet, tube and forgings to a wide variety of markets, including
Oil and Gas, Industrial Fasteners and specialist Engineering
industries. About 25% of its
business is exported mainly to Europe, with some to Asia and
South America.
The Company had initially built a good reputation, but in
early 2000 it had
started to lose its way. In September 2003, Mark Burton and
a local entrepreneur, John Robinson bought the company. Mark
is now the major shareholder. Mark and John set out to restore
AI Materials ’ reputation for
quality and customer responsiveness. Whilst they achieved
much success, by
mid 2005 delivery performance was still below one of the company
’ s ISO 9001:2000 objectives: to achieve 90% on time
delivery. It was at this point that AI Materials Ltd contacted
the Manufacturing Advisory Service (Yorkshire & Humber)
‘MAS’. Working with Manufacturing Expert, Mike
Andrews of MCCR & Associates (a MAS Associate), AI Materials
undertook a 15 day manufacturing improvement project which
focused on addressing the delivery performance issue.
Key Achievements
As a result of the 15 day manufacturing improvement project,
the company
achieved the following improvements: ?
- 12% improvement in delivery performance over the five months of the project;
- 35% improvement in baseline value added; and ? Increase in stock turns from 4.9 times per year to 7.9 times per year – a 62% improvement.
AI Materials is
now undertaking a strategic manufacturing improvement project
with MAS to further improve supply chain relations and develop
stock holding processes which will enable them to effectively
handle the transition to holding more stock in house. Making
it Happen
The project began by establishing delivery performance baselines
so that actual performance could be captured and analysed.
The result of this showed that only 40% of orders were meeting
the agreed delivery deadlines – quite a way off the
company ’s ISO 9001:2000 objective of 90%.
With this information in hand, MAS Manufacturing Specialist
Mike Andrews began to dig deeper into the deliverie which
failed to meet their deadlines to
try to identify common causes. Mike checked the Company ’s
current processes and systems and quickly identified issues
that were affecting the
Companies ability to meet customer expectations. Mike then
analysed the different types of orders which the company handled.
He identified that stock orders were reliably good, mainly
because the whole sales supply process was under the control
of the Company. However on orders where the company operated
in a supply chain (receiving stock and goods from sub-contractors
before dispatching to the customer), the ability to meet delivery
targets was
very poor. The results of the orders analysis was presented
to the company’ s management team and an action plan
agreed which would fundamentally change the way AI Materials
looked at their supply chain. The Company agreed that they
would: Increase stock orders thereby reducing the reliance
on sub-contractors; work with existing suppliers to improve
their reliability and negotiate higher priority for AI Materials
orders; and source new suppliers who can better meet AI Material’s
requirements, including the sourcing of suppliers who can
produce smaller sizes of ingot. What AI Materials people
said: “I have seen a big improvement in output and orders
since the project
started.” John Rhodes, Inspector “It ’s
brilliant. We are not perfect yet
but there has been a big improvement in the customer ’s
view of us.”
Muriel Slater, Sales “The biggest advantage to me has
been the time it has given me to find other ways of producing
and other routes.”
Highlights of Achievements
- 12% improvement in delivery performance over the five
months of
the project; - 35% improvement in baseline value added; and Increase
in stock turns from 4.9 times per year to 7.9 times per
year – a 62% improvement.